Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpQe6nvL/PEANO_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(M)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V2)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → AND(isNat(M), isNat(N))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(0)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V1)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → ISNAT(V1)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(M)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V2)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → AND(isNat(M), isNat(N))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(0)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V1)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → ISNAT(V1)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 7 SCCs with 20 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
S(active(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 1

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₃
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = 0
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                              ↳ QDP

                                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                              ↳ QDP

                                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                    ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                              ↳ QDP

                                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                    ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [15] with a polynomial ordering [25], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [17] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))

The following rules are removed from R:

isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 2 + x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                              ↳ QDP

                                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                    ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                            ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1